The voters are engaged in this election like none other in recent times. In the ITV debate last week the personality of Nick Clegg became visible. His normal context has been House of Commons amid constant yah-boo from Tory and Labour - but for 90 minutes last week he was seen as a political leader and as normal. The shock rocketed him and his party up the polls leaving Tory, Lib-Dem and Labour within a few points of each other. So what can any of them do to break ahead?
Here is a choice policy, long advocated on The Free Lunch, and how they might use it: The Citizens Royalty (aka: Citizens Dividend/Income, a non-means-tested benefit to every citizen). It has been costed as fully affordable when compared with the current welfare & tax regime. It would sweep away the worst complexities of the current benefit system. If necessary the allowances and tax rates for the higher paid could be adjusted at the top end to claw some back.
So what bits of their manifestos are involved? The Lib-Dems will give you a new tax-free allowance on the first £10,000 earned. Standard rate taxpayers will be £700 better off. But this does not give a single bean to those earning very little or nothing (i.e. the poorest). So not so fair for them - but a Citizen's Royalty would put actual money in their pocket. The Tories are giving £150 (again through a tax allowance) to married people - not so fair to singles - OK that's the point, but a Citizens Royalty would help married, singles and children (these are already getting a bit of one with Child Benefit). Nothing special on tax help from Labour. They abolished the 20% tax band so aren't really bothered about helping the low-paid apart from forcing them through the Labour welfare/tax credit obstacle course, which could be dismantled wholesale through the Citizen's Royalty.
If any party really wants to raise levels of fairness, as all say they do, a Citizen's Royalty would be an obvious way as it helps the poorest most. If they want to save costs of bureaucracy the Citizens Royalty would do so. If they want to bring in a Big Society with individuals and groups sparing time to take over state-run things, the Citizen's Royalty would provide a new source of funding at the individual and family level so people could manage financially better and spare the time to help, or donate to others who could.
The Citizen's Royalty would help bring a sense of citizenship in the immigration debate. Every immigrant on becoming a citizen, would get the Royalty but only after say 20 years. It would make a financial difference to being British.
If the Lib-Dems can give away £700 through tax allowances and make it affordable another party could probably give away £500 as a Citizen's Royalty to everyone. That is a good level to start at but there are sources of redistributable wealth for the Royalty that are even now going to bankers and landowners in huge amounts. Read The Free Lunch - Fairness with Freedom. If you want to help a political party in the next two weeks show them this page. Desperate times need desperate measures - they might help themselves and bring us a fairer society. It's that desperate.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
Regarding New Fairness and some form and amount of Guaranteed Income, Citizens' Income or Citizens' Dividend, as well as the most just and democratic way to finance it, the U.K. could learn much from, for example, the Civil Rights Party of Canada.
Introducing a Democratic Socioeconomic Platform, in search of a Democratic Political Party
http://www.centersds.com/dsep.html
~~~~~
Specifically, Socioeconomic Democracy (SeD) is a theoretical and practical socioeconomic system wherein there exist both some form and amount of locally appropriate Universally Guaranteed Personal Income (UGI) and some form and amount of locally appropriate Maximum Allowable Personal Wealth (MAW), with both the lower bound on personal material poverty and the upper bound on personal material wealth set and adjusted democratically by all participants of a democratic society … (continued at)
http://www.centersds.com/intro2dsep.html
~~~~~
Different Possibilities for the Magnitudes of the Two Democratically Set Bounds of Universally Guaranteed Personal Income (UGI) and Maximum Allowable Personal Wealth (MAW) in the practice of Socioeconomic Democracy are considered at
http://www.centersds.com/possibilities.html
~~~~~
Ramifications of Socioeconomic Democracy
It is clear the world desperately needs a fundamentally improved economic system. Two major aspects of this necessary improvement are the Definition of Wealth and the Distribution of Wealth. The democratic distribution of wealth and the resultant desirable ramifications in the socioeconomic realm are considered here. …
As described at length elsewhere, Socioeconomic Democracy would create economic incentive and provide necessary funds to effect significant reduction in an almost surprisingly diverse array of unnecessary yet painful individual, societal and global problems.
These intimately intertwined problems include (but are by no means limited to) those familiar ones involving: automation, computerization and robotization; budget deficits and national debts; bureaucracy; maltreatment of children; crime and punishment; development, sustainable or otherwise; ecology, environment, resources and pollution; education; the elderly; the feminine majority; inflation; international conflict; intranational conflict; involuntary employment; involuntary unemployment; labor strife and strikes; sick medical and health care; military metamorphosis; natural disasters; pay justice; planned obsolescence; political participation; poverty; racism; sexism; untamed technology; and the General Welfare. Below are sketched some of the desirable impact of Socioeconomic Democracy on all these serious societal problems … (continued at)
http://www.centersds.com/ramifications.html
~~~~~
Sincerely,
Robley E. George
Director, Center for the Study of Democratic Societies
www.CenterSDS.com
Coordinador, Nonkilling Economics Research Committee
http://www.nonkilling.org/node/7
Policy Adviser for Civil Rights Party of Canada
http://raphael-for-prime-minister.ning.com/group/policyadviserforthecivilrightspartyofcanadapolitic
georgeCSDS@aol.com
You probably know this but the Citizens Income was Liberal Democrat party policy for a while after the party was formed. It was supported by Conference, but later dropped as unaffordable with the full support of the senior party people and spin doctors.
A realistic Citizens Income would represent a profound economic change as shown in the Namibia experiment
It is simple to communicate and likely to be politically robust (like universal healthcare is in all civilised countries).
Post a Comment